[08:43:48] <pmlopes> @pikajude you can use the LoggerHandler for that: https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-web/blob/master/vertx-web/src/main/java/io/vertx/ext/web/handler/LoggerHandler.java
[08:48:30] <ovestoerholt> Hi! Anyone with recommendations on how to query LDAP servers (AD)? Not only for authentication like Shiro, but for getting person info.
[09:50:49] <matzew> running the “fatjar-http2”, I am getting “ .vertx.core.VertxException: javax.net.ssl.SSLException: failed to set certificate and key”
[09:51:02] <matzew> Is there anythning I need to do in addition? I thought it's all done for me
[09:51:20] <matzew> Java version: 1.8.0_121, vendor: Oracle Corporation
[09:51:20] <matzew> Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-184.108.40.206-1.b14.fc25.x86_64/jre
[09:56:35] <tsegismont> matzew, same here, can you open an issue?
[09:56:45] <matzew> OK, of course
[09:56:50] <tsegismont> thanks
[09:56:56] <matzew> tsegismont, any JIRA ? or GH issue ?
[09:57:04] <tsegismont> no, no JIRA :)
[09:57:06] <tsegismont> GitHub
[09:57:29] <tsegismont> matzew, http://vertx.io/community
[09:57:45] <tsegismont> (For the full details)
[10:18:43] <matzew> tsegismont, https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-examples/issues/175
[10:19:16] <tsegismont> thanks matzew
[10:49:04] <temporalfox> ppatiern hi
[10:50:19] <msavy> howdy, i think you guys need to rebuild the vertx.io website to reflect those recent changes
[10:50:28] <temporalfox> which ones ?
[10:50:31] <temporalfox> the fixes in the blog ?
[10:51:52] <msavy> yeah, just happened to be downloading the beta today and noticed it
[10:52:08] <msavy> not a big thing, but thought i'd mention it in passing
[11:54:11] <ppatiern> temporalfox: hi
[12:05:26] <temporalfox> hi
[12:09:16] <ppatiern> were you searching for me ?
[12:30:00] <temporalfox> ppatiern yes I wanted you to review the doc changes for kafka
[12:30:05] <temporalfox> so we can merge them
[12:30:11] <temporalfox> and make another pass on the review
[12:30:20] <ppatiern> I wrote some comments on your PR
[12:30:21] <temporalfox> (i.e /me reviewing things)
[12:30:23] <temporalfox> ok
[12:30:27] <temporalfox> I will handle that this afternoon
[12:30:32] <ppatiern> ok ;)
[12:34:20] <ppatiern> temporalfox: can I ask you a question related to sequential composition ?
[12:36:27] <temporalfox> ppatiern yes
[12:37:05] <ppatiern> I'm seeing the example in the Java core manual with filesystem and 3 futures http://vertx.io/docs/vertx-core/java/#_async_coordination
[12:37:34] <ppatiern> I'm also viewing the compose() and completer() source code in the Future class
[12:37:52] <ppatiern> related to the example I can't see how the startFuture.complete() or .fail() is called
[12:39:32] <temporalfox> I think we should remove this from the doc
[12:39:37] <temporalfox> the form to call is
[12:39:51] <temporalfox> compose(Function<T, Future<U>)
[12:40:01] <temporalfox> the other was made before this form existed
[12:41:30] <ppatiern> btw in the “old” form I can't see any point where the startFuture.complete() is called
[12:41:33] <ppatiern> the doc says :
[12:41:34] <ppatiern> In this second case, the[unknown:nbsp]Handler[unknown:nbsp]should complete the[unknown:nbsp]next[unknown:nbsp]future to report its success or failure.You can use[unknown:nbsp]completer[unknown:nbsp]that completes a future with the operation result or failure. It avoids having to write the[unknown:nbsp]traditional:[unknown:nbsp]if success then complete the future else fail the future.
[12:41:46] <temporalfox> I think the online version is broken
[12:42:07] <ppatiern> so I should call explicitly the startFuture.complete() in the handler right ?
[12:42:11] <temporalfox> it should be correct here
[12:42:11] <temporalfox> http://vertx.io/docs/3.4.0.Beta1/vertx-core/java/
[12:42:26] <temporalfox> I don't see where you commented in the PR
[12:42:39] <ppatiern> oh now it works to me !
[12:42:43] <ppatiern> thanks to the right doc
[12:43:04] <temporalfox> https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-kafka-client/pull/9
[12:43:07] <temporalfox> ah ok
[12:43:20] <temporalfox> I'll merge it then
[12:43:20] <temporalfox> or you can
[12:43:46] <ppatiern> I didn't submit the review
[12:43:49] <ppatiern> it was in pending
[12:43:53] <ppatiern> can you see the comments now ?
[12:44:36] <temporalfox> ah
[12:44:47] <temporalfox> I forgot also to do that once
[12:44:52] <temporalfox> wil have a look after lunch
[12:45:02] <ppatiern> good lunch !
[12:45:03] <ppatiern> ;)
[15:01:58] <temporalfox> ppatiern I've added an example with vertx buffer serializers
[15:03:38] <ppatiern> temporalfox: I can't see it in the PR
[15:03:46] <temporalfox> I've added it directly
[15:03:54] <temporalfox> I think we are close to conclude the review
[15:04:09] <ppatiern> but I don't see the commit
[15:06:26] <temporalfox> ah
[15:06:30] <temporalfox> hint: (e.g., 'git pull …') before pushing again.
[15:06:30] <temporalfox> hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push –help' for details.
[15:06:31] <temporalfox> hold on
[15:06:32] <temporalfox> I rebase
[15:06:54] <temporalfox> I said it is eventually consistent
[15:06:56] <temporalfox> done
[15:13:52] <temporalfox> ppatiern I think we can merge the initial-work branch
[15:14:01] <temporalfox> I'm giong to send an email to vertx-dev abou t it
[15:15:22] <ppatiern> now I see the commits
[15:29:37] <ppatiern> temporalfox: I merged … but I can't delete initial-work and make master as default branch
[15:30:00] <ppatiern> why I don't have the “settings” icon ? too few rights for doing that ?
[15:38:07] <temporalfox> ppatiern yes
[15:38:19] <temporalfox> the project lead can do it
[15:38:19] <temporalfox> (i.e me)
[15:38:24] <ppatiern> ok
[15:38:28] <temporalfox> that being said we don't need that much access to settings
[15:38:43] <temporalfox> let me do it
[15:38:46] <ppatiern> sure
[15:38:49] <ppatiern> no problem
[15:39:24] <temporalfox> I think you can delete now the initial work branch
[15:45:22] <ppatiern> yes
[15:46:23] <temporalfox> I'm going to update CI with it
[15:47:50] <ppatiern> I'm quite new to the Vert.x world … but I guess that the 3.4.0 release will be epic !
[18:28:50] <temporalfox> all releases are epic
[18:29:19] <temporalfox> ppatiern I've integrated the kakfa client in the stack
[18:29:26] <temporalfox> where should it go on the website ?
[18:29:33] <temporalfox> messaging section I guess ?
[18:29:37] <ppatiern> sure
[18:30:01] <temporalfox> right now we have an integration section
[18:30:08] <temporalfox> http://vertx.io/docs/#integration
[18:30:15] <ppatiern> I think that is good as well
[18:30:21] <temporalfox> http://vertx.io/docs/3.4.0.Beta1/#integration
[18:30:38] <ppatiern> I'm for that
[18:30:43] <ppatiern> Integration
[18:31:19] <ppatiern> just a note
[18:31:32] <ppatiern> I see that before the MQTT server there isn't the “IoT” title section
[18:31:44] <ppatiern> and the MQTT Server text is ah higher size
[18:31:53] <ppatiern> like the titles in the other sections
[18:34:30] <ppatiern> temporalfox: in the index.html there is a problem here <li><a href=“#mqtt-server”>IoT</a></li>
[18:34:37] <temporalfox> yes
[18:34:44] <temporalfox> it's because we have a single entry
[18:34:49] <temporalfox> it's not a problem
[18:34:55] <ppatiern> and a missing <h3 id=“devops”>IoT</h3>
[18:34:57] <temporalfox> I prefer it to be labeled as IoT in the menu
[18:35:04] <ppatiern> (I copied from devops )
[18:35:04] <temporalfox> but keep only mqtt-server as there is nothing else
[18:35:06] <temporalfox> in the page
[18:35:27] <ppatiern> but having the title section is more consistent as user experience
[18:35:39] <ppatiern> even having the size of MQTT server the same as the other components
[18:35:47] <ppatiern> isn't it possible to fix ?
[18:35:58] <ppatiern> or at least imho … it should be fixed
[19:52:09] <ghost_x> Hey - I was wondering if someone could help me with SSL in vertx?
[19:52:29] <ghost_x> I typed out my full question here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/42233616/java-custom-trust-manager-vertx-3
[19:54:06] <ghost_x> Walking through the code - the closest I have got is “new VertxTrustManagerFactory” → but that all seems to be very locked down.
[19:57:55] <ghost_x> Budged over to the google group: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/vertx/V25r0zc_wPc
[21:21:36] <temporalfox> ghost_x I replied to you on the site
[22:48:55] <ghost_x> temporalfox - Cheers! I replied.
[22:51:12] <temporalfox> hi ghost_x it would be great if you can debug it and see what happens
[22:51:23] <temporalfox> the SSLHelper class is quite straightforward
[22:51:33] <temporalfox> and probably following the flow would help understand what is going on
[22:51:55] <ghost_x> Stepping through it slowly right now - I was hoping you might know off the top of your head
[22:53:33] <temporalfox> no, I think it should work
[22:53:41] <temporalfox> but it's actually not tested per se
[22:53:46] <temporalfox> although we have three different impls of this
[22:53:55] <temporalfox> and the three work (tests)
[22:54:07] <temporalfox> Pem / Jks / Pkcs
[22:54:12] <ghost_x> SSLHelper.java 104 statically loads everything
[22:54:27] <temporalfox> right now we are a bit stretch
[22:55:01] <ghost_x> Mmm - SSLHelper:108 ignores any trust manager settings
[22:55:11] <temporalfox> did you look at getTrustMgrFactory
[22:55:12] <temporalfox> ?
[22:55:18] <temporalfox> line 298
[22:55:40] <ghost_x> Stepping through it right now - 108 is called first - which means everything is loaded unnecessarily
[22:55:48] <ghost_x> I'll let you know when I get to 298
[22:57:45] <temporalfox> 108 line is only to get the list of DEFAULT_JDK_CIPHER_SUITE
[23:00:47] <ghost_x> Hmm the function at 292 is never called
[23:01:41] <ghost_x> nvm it is - debugger wasn't triggered
[23:06:28] <ghost_x> JdkSslContext calls context.init(null, null, null) again causing the second load
[23:10:23] <ghost_x> Problem is at JdkSslServerContext.java:241
[23:11:30] <ghost_x> (actually no)
[23:14:01] <ghost_x> AH!
[23:14:25] <ghost_x> You don't run engineInit before calling the engineGetTrustManagers
[23:14:38] <ghost_x> So it returns null
[23:17:46] <ghost_x> And logging doesn't work inside the inner class, which made me think it was never called
[23:23:32] <temporalfox> so is it a bug in SSLHElper ?
[23:24:06] <ghost_x> At some point before JdkSslServerContext.java:241 is called - you need to call engineInit
[23:24:19] <ghost_x> It can throw errors so preferably early on
[23:25:03] <ghost_x> I'm just initialising it manually at the constructor now - but that's a work around. Vertx should call the init
[23:25:07] <temporalfox> could you make a test for this ?
[23:25:43] <temporalfox> it could go here
[23:25:43] <temporalfox> https://github.com/eclipse/vert.x/blob/master/src/test/java/io/vertx/test/core/SSLHelperTest.java
[23:25:57] <temporalfox> just giving a created TrustOption interface
[23:26:03] <temporalfox> and make sure the callback is called
[23:26:07] <temporalfox> to make the test pass
[23:26:11] <ghost_x> (y)
[23:28:31] <ghost_x> Also - I'm not sure if you've seen the spam Vertx causes with “System.setProperty(“javax.net.debug”, “ssl”);” enabled
[23:28:39] <ghost_x> Might be worth looking at that
[23:28:49] <ghost_x> It loads in the root certs twice
[23:33:52] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o temporal_
[23:43:42] <ghost_x> Oh - I finally got it working! After two days! I can now establish a connection to a server which doesn't have the clients cert - and it will add it to an in-memory trust store on the server.