[00:11:00] <AlexLehm> the jenkins starting working again, so the pr is ok with the unit test
[01:04:14] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporal_ [05:14:43] <kuwv> I'm outputting a buffer to a file using writetofile but there is no formatting. Is there a buffer type I should use or should I just add the newline characters to my codec? [15:54:09] <tsegismont> Hi guys. I'm working on vertx-hawkular-metrics, adapting to next version changes [15:54:56] <tsegismont> I can't get it working for now, I get NPE when the SPI impl is created [15:55:19] <tsegismont> It happens because in my io.vertx.ext.hawkular.impl.VertxMetricsImpl#VertxMetricsImpl [15:55:42] <tsegismont> I try to get a Context instance with #getOrCreateContext [15:56:20] <tsegismont> but with the latest changes [15:56:22] <tsegismont> io.vertx.core.impl.ContextImpl#ContextImpl [15:56:47] <tsegismont> needs the internalBlockingPool to be ready [15:56:59] <tsegismont> but when the Metrics implementation is loaded [15:57:34] <tsegismont> the internal blocking pool as not been created yet [15:57:51] <tsegismont> it's not the first time I have this kind of issue [15:59:01] <tsegismont> and I wonder if we could have a callback in io.vertx.core.spi.metrics.VertxMetrics [15:59:15] <tsegismont> to indicate that the vertx instance is fully initialized [15:59:33] <tsegismont> so that spi implementors can safely start using it [15:59:43] <tsegismont> WDYT? [16:48:48] <tsegismont> I'll use io.vertx.core.spi.metrics.VertxMetrics#eventBusInitialized [20:13:57] * ChanServ sets mode: +o temporalfox
[20:18:17] <Yakabu> Hi. In this talk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMtoN9wFEOU), Tim mentions that vert.x 3.0 will feature something similar to supervision trees. Does this feature exist?
[20:22:17] <Yakabu> I'm looking to build a hierarchically structured application, with many distributed nodes connected over TCP/websocket. I'd like to manage the control of nodes with each node having a parent. Is this usecase suitable for vert.x?
[22:52:17] *** ChanServ sets mode: +o temporal_